Here is the link to the ongoing discussion taking place on bitcointalk forum
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic ... sg14277576
Or the direct download
http://1.curecoinmirror.com/sigmax/Sigm ... tBeta1.zip
wuffy68 wrote:1. Since the current TESTNET version is CPU-based SHA-256, with a planned switch to HDD mining in the next TESTNET version. Will the HDD mining contain the "Merkel Trees of Lamport Signatures" Algorithm? If not, at which point does that enter the equation?
wuffy68 wrote:2. A question was posed "Will CC 2.0 be SHA-256?", I don't believe it will. It will use the special algorithm listed above, but this also needs clarification.
wuffy68 wrote:3. Paraphrasing a question out there: Could we continue 2.0 based on SigmaX but use only a single coin similar to todays 1.0 setup; with a percentage dedicated to PoW mining and a percentage dedicated to folding (the poster suggests 30/70% split).
For question 3 above, I would go a step farther and suggest a "chain of chains" model where folding is just one of many types of signature-based rewarded applications. With other types beneficial activities having the capability to be tied to the SigmaX backbone in the future (maybe NeurealAI?). Any future offending service could be voted off with PoW taking up the slack.
Could a split of signature based activity like folding or other DCN work be dynamically weighted with a voting system in the future?
CC 2.0 Release A
CC 2.0 Release B
PoW 20 %
CC 2.0 Release C
Earthquake Prediction (just stabbing in the dark :-) 10%
PoW 20 %
CC 2.0 Release D
Earthquake Prediction (just stabbing in the dark :-) 10% (DCN becomes non-functional or offensive)
PoW 30 %